Rocky Mountain Shysters: Four Takeaways on the Decision to Remove Trump

Topic: Elections

A relatively quiet news day yesterday concluded with a big bang in the late afternoon, with reports emerging that President Trump is to be banned from the ballot in the conquered state of Colorado.  The reasoning itself sounds like it was written by Democrat Party activists (probably because in large part, it is), with exhausted, overused terms like insurrection thrown around by lawless, criminal Colorado Supreme Court “justices.”

Justifiably, the typical outrage and panic ensued on the right over such abusive and irresponsible judicial behavior.  Because I’ve become accustomed to such nonsense governing the judiciary in this country, I was neither surprised, nor really all that angry.  The injustice of it all is baked into the cake at this point.  The man seeking short term satisfaction in all political matters in modern America stands only to be disappointed by these juvenile and predictable outcomes; however, the man with the long run in mind can easily find good news in today’s third-world ruling.

Here are four reasons why the Colorado Supreme Court banning Donald J. Trump from state ballots serves as a solid favor unknowingly granted by our mindless, soulless opponents:

I.               The U.S. Supreme Court will Absolutely Reverse Course

If even quasi-Soviet satellite states like Minnesota refuse to throw Trump off the ballot, then you can bet your bottom dollar a 5-4 Republican-appointed Supreme Court with at least four generally reliable voices of reason will overturn this absolutely ridiculous decision that seasoned Democrat political operatives assuredly recognize as pure folly.  The impact of the reversal will be far worse than if the Colorado Supreme Court quietly and politely mimicked their Minnesota counterparts and patted themselves on the back for their perceived fairness in allowing President Trump on the ballot for the voters to decide (wink, wink).

With primary season right around the corner, an appeal to the Supreme Court will be expedited and ruled upon quickly, giving the accurate impression that Colorado’s Supreme Court is made up almost entirely of political activists, clearly emphasizing the extent of judicial corruption that has prevented meaningful change in the United States.  After all, how does one reconcile some left-wing states declining to remove Trump from the ballot, and others going for the jugular?  Something that serious needs to be replicated uniformly across the board, or not at all.  This one is a lay-up.

II.             The Winning Side Does Not Remove Its Opponent from Perceived Competition