Why Arizona Courts Must Take on Signature Verification - Inside Lake's 10-Point Win

Topic: Research

The Arizona Court of Appeals will take up Kari Lake’s election contest on February 1, and legal filings have been flying from both parties to the contest.  The appeal is expedited, as the nature of the appeal, and the relief requested, is indeed urgent and of national importance.

New information came to light in Monday’s Arizona Senate hearing, and the usual suspects performed the role of the fox guarding the henhouse, as anticipated.  Here is what Maricopa County Elections Department communications director, Megan Gilbertson, functioning in the capacity of chief propagandist, had to say:

“Monday’s presentation to the Arizona Senate is textbook disinformation, taking a common situation that occurs at a voting location and twisting it to cast doubt on the integrity of our elections.”

Those who continue to allege Maricopa County operates with integrity in administering elections are upset about procedure, which is ironic given their deliberate suppression of a greater than 3:1 Republican turnout on Election Day, November 8.  They attest that the appeals court should not be expected to take in new evidence but should only review findings of the lower court in complying with Arizona law.

In his weak-kneed punt of the Lake case on Christmas Eve, when most Americans were watching A Christmas Story re-runs and taking the day off from social media, Judge Peter Thompson was able to do so without the elephant in the room, signature match, weighing on his decision.  Lake’s team still presented more than enough information in the measly two-day trial to prove to more than three-quarters of Americans that Maricopa County botched its election on purpose to sweep away a slate of candidates that would expose Arizona’s McCain cartel in its rampant corruption and cripple the national election fraud infrastructure, given that the Grand Canyon State is arguably ground zero for this national crisis.