One of my favorite movies ever is Braveheart, which follows the life of the Scottish revolutionary William Wallace, played by Mel Gibson. It is most well-known for its litany of grim battle scenes complete with the clashing of sword and shield, and because this carnage is so artfully depicted, many lose sight of the brilliant depth of the story. Wallace was a great freedom fighter by most historical accounts not given by the English, and even though all epics suffer from some degree of embellishment, Braveheart contains some truly quotable gems.
In one scene, after several key victories, Wallace defies the Scottish nobles, who serve as an accurate portrayal of our permanent political bureaucracy today, by quipping, “There is a difference between us. You think the people of this country exist to provide you with position. I think your position exists to provide those people with freedom. And I go to make sure that they have it.”
Many of today’s supporters of America’s first-world political regime, who are incapable of securing their own freedom or forming their own divergent opinions despite plenty of evidence to make that extremely simple, are unhappy with the results of our most recent presidential election, which position Donald Trump to be just the second man, along with Grover Cleveland, to return to the White House for non-consecutive Presidential terms. Of course, a growing number of these lemmings are alleging Donald Trump won the race because of widespread election fraud.
There is a difference between us and them.
The difference is that while we were totally stonewalled from doing any meaningful investigation into the 2020 quasi-election (outside of a controlled audit of Maricopa County that was stripped of real teeth by a weak Arizona legislature) in which Joe Biden didn’t campaign but received over 81 million ballots in making Donald Trump the first incumbent president since 1888 to gain votes and “lose” reelection (another commonality with Cleveland), practically everyone I know in the election integrity world is more than thrilled to offer Harris and company every opportunity to overturn every stone in the elections realm until they are either convinced they lost, or figure out just how badly their ilk have contributed to destroying the legitimacy of our elections in just three short decades. I recommended last week they start with Milwaukee County.
If this makes you anxious, it shouldn’t. First off, I agree with my great friend James Tesauro:
We should never be ok with “too big to rig.” There is so much work to do to make sure elections are fair, that when the most famous man on the rock can’t run for president anymore, we can secure a fair election for a good leader.
Second, I have no doubt Donald Trump won the election, and by much larger margins than will be certified. The results go with the grain of all known trends, indicators, bellwethers, and predictors, which were of course some of the biggest signals the 2020 race was heavily tainted. Any digging by Harris and company would be abruptly halted once the truth about their ballot manufacturing in Philadelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee, Phoenix, Las Vegas, Atlanta, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Seattle (and many other places) came to light, and we would almost certainly discover the incineration or shredding of many hundreds of thousands of legally cast mail ballots for Trump throughout the states.
Finally, we Americans should not accept a tainted system that we were able to game this one time for one of the most famous people to live since Jesus Christ. After all totals settle and are certified, he will have won Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin all under two points, and Georgia by less than three. Tilted the other direction, Harris would have 286 electoral votes. If a phony system could be rigged for us, then it can always be rigged against us, so if down ballot candidates did cheat, then we must expunge that, as well (do not misread my statement as me alleging Trump, or anyone for that matter, cheated on the Republican side – it is purely hypothetical).
On November 6, the day after Trump had been called the winner, Stuart Thompson from The New York Times called me up. Stuart accidentally became one of my favorite people in the media sector because he wrote what will live on as a badge of honor for me as long as I live – an article highlighting my forecasts that include the potential for election fraud, my own exposé written a few weeks before Election Day, when I happened to pick every electoral vote correctly in defiance of the “expert” magicians and sorcerers quoted in their piece. Stuart and I clearly don’t agree on many things politically, but we’ve always gotten along and I’m willing to put my thoughts in the Old Gray Lady if they are sought. He asked me on Election Day + 1:
So you guys don’t want to talk about election fraud now that Trump has won?
I had already thought this through, so I told Mr. Thompson exactly what I’ve told you:
AUDIT EVERYTHING.
Start with Milwaukee County, because for the fourth federal election in a row, they’ve found a way to ensure they would be the last to report vote tallies, even though they are primarily comprised of an urban hellhole that is declining in population and in the size of its voter roll, thereby limiting its own ability and likelihood to continually produce as many votes every other year as it did in each preceding election. Then expand the reach into every single state that operates Automatic Voter Registration, because the ones that don’t have it happened to go 25 to 1, or 248 Electoral Votes to 5, for Donald Trump:
After we’ve done that, maybe we can check out Arizona, where 2 out of the state’s 15 counties contribute over three-quarters of the vote while taking turns tag-teaming the rest of the state to selectively dump ballots to force premature race calls in an effort to convince you that Donald Trump will take more than 52% of Arizona’s vote, but a gap of 8% will develop between Trump and his Senate counterpart who would vote yes for pretty much any Trump agenda item that would find its way into the chamber. Yes, ticket splitting exists, but why can’t we have any transparency to figure out if that gap is 2%, like Kari Lake’s polling suggested, or 8%, which will likely be what stands up?
I invite our liberal friends to check out the Trump-won state of Nevada, presidentially red for the first time since 2004. Maybe he stole that one, too, because Democrats won a massive majority in the state legislature andtook the Senate seat after many grueling days of counting, not long after a ruling came down allowing them to accept ballots without a postmark for three days, which of course came overwhelmingly from the two remaining Democrat survival pockets, Washoe and Clark Counties.
Those blue walls states – man, how did Trump win them? After all, there are more registered Democrats in Pennsylvania than Republicans. But fair is fair, so I think we should start with all Bob Casey’s UOCAVA and provisional ballots that have cut Dave McCormick’s Senate margin in half just over the weekend as Casey acts like the daddy longlegs spider that won’t go down the damn sink, with America the hostage forced to watch the blatant cheating. You can also jump into Michigan if you want, where Trump also won, but only as long as we get eyeballs on the votes that put the charming and charismatic Elissa Slotkin up by an eyelash for the open U.S. Senate seat while slashing a commanding Trump margin to well under 2%. Evidence of Slotkin’s charm and appeal below:
There is a difference between us and them. We are here to pass down a functioning system to posterity, and even in victory, we demand a full accounting and inventory of our embarrassingly awful system that is still tallying up ballots, flipping down ballot races, compromising the judiciary, and serving as an object of horror to all nations who thought we had our sh*t together.
There will be more transparency than you can ask for if President Trump appoints me in any official capacity to turn over every stone.
Seth Keshel, MBA, is a former Army Captain of Military Intelligence and Afghanistan veteran. His analytical method of election forecasting and analytics is known worldwide, and he has been commended by President Donald J. Trump for his work in the field.
And to your point, Captain K, how do we get the Trump administration to appoint you to do exactly as you suggest? I feel that it was only because we had a political environment that mandated a change election that produced margins large enough that this one couldn’t be stolen like it was in 2020. And with Dems running better candidates than a dreadful Kamala in the future, we can expect elections going forward to be much closer, and we already know how those go with institutional fraud built into the election system. It is absolutely dire that we have a national commission on election integrity while Trump has the upper hand.
Where the heck is Trump and the RNC? Why aren't they looking into these 4 Senate races? If there are real investigations done by the DOJ when Trump gets in, every stolen seat should be reversed going back to 2020.