"Trump Can't Win if He Talks About Rigged Elections" is the King of All Lies

Topic: Perspective

When revisiting 2020, that traumatic, nation-altering year, it is impossible to miss the signs that the corrupt bureaucratic state and its media allies were preparing for something big.  We were led to voluntarily destroy our own economy, rip our kids out of the normalcies of their childhoods, abide by illegally instituted election procedures done on the fly, and practice arbitrary standards of social distancing, which didn’t matter if you were seated in a restaurant or attending a BLM rally.

These ominous signs gave the impression that the 2020 election would be a third world disaster, even before it happened.  President Trump warned months before that the election would be rigged but was constantly thwarted in state after state when his teams challenged executive fiat instituting mail voting and other cheat mechanisms.  Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, under fire for pushing back against the takeover of the Lone Star State, was also aware of the election-rigging of 2020, suing successfully a dozen times to combat open sabotage of Texas’s elections.

Yes, Trump, Paxton, and patriots knew the election would be rigged.  Still, most of us expected that like in 2016, the 2020 election would still be winnable.  None of the major voices in election integrity today believed the capability to plug in millions upon millions of counterfeit ballots existed – until we lived through it in real time.  What was not possible decades ago, or properly strategized for in 2016, was suddenly possible thanks to the fusion of sophisticated electronic voting systems, corrupted voter rolls, and pinpointed data working in conjunction with no-excuse mail-in voting amplified by paid teams of ballot harvesters used to form the foundation of the Democrat vote pile.

By alluding beforehand to the 2020 election being rigged, men like Trump and Paxton accurately identified the unfair advantage sought by Democrats that, in a close race, could have flipped key states to Biden and cost Trump re-election.  No one, Trump included, expected the incumbent to garner 74 million votes, a gain of 11 million from the previous election, and still be outrun by rampant cheating.  It had never been done before.  In case you’re new to my writing, President Trump thus became the first incumbent president since Grover Cleveland in 1888 to gain votes from the previous election and lose.  Three campaigns since that time (Franklin Roosevelt twice, and then Obama) lost votes from previous election and won.

That brings me to the heart of the matter: President Trump did not “lose” re-election because he complained about rigged elections.  If that were the case, he would not have gained 11 million votes and satisfied every meaningful trend, indicator, bellwether, and predictor in place for more than a century that, together, point to an emphatic re-election win.

-

Now, what do we hear today from the mainstream commentariat and, lately, the Conservative, Inc., wannabe statesmen?

Trump can’t win if he pushes the “rigged election” narrative because it will alienate an electorate that doesn’t care about that issue.

No, morons, it will not.  The reason candidates like President Trump or Kari Lake have been “losing” lately is because those seeking to preserve the current order, that of a global bureaucracy hellbent on keeping the world engaged in endless wars, realigning the global economy via corrupt trade agreements, and pitting citizens against one another by instigating racial, cultural, and social strife of various kinds have perfected election manipulation.

In fact, Rasmussen recently reported 62% of Americans believe the 2020 election was decided thanks to fraud, including 45% of Democrats and 64% of Independents.  Even if Rasmussen were off by 10% on Democrats and Independents, the numbers are still striking.  Furthermore, 80% of Republicans surveyed express belief that the 2020 election was compromised by widespread fraud.  Kari Lake’s lawsuits contain similar positions – that a staggering majority of Americans and Arizonans side with her campaign in the belief that Maricopa County deliberately sabotaged its own election and disenfranchised its own citizens.

I have written recently that there are many I respect who back Governor DeSantis for President.  In fact, I haven’t been critical of him until recently (see this positive article from September 2022), when it became clear he was running because he’s counting on President Trump being unjustly persecuted by our corrupt courts.  After all, who would step away from a catbird seat as Florida governor while losing in hypothetical polling by over 40 points to Trump, if not for an ace up the sleeve?

So, Captain, what are you getting at?

Twitter is full of Conservative, Inc., influencers who made a career off of Trump after receiving forgiveness for the petulant Never Trump positions they pushed in 2016 who have once again shown their true colors, failing to recognize that President Trump is solely responsible for DeSantis being governor at all, even reaching in to the 2018 midterms to point out the attempted steal in Broward County that tried to subvert not only DeSantis’s narrow victory, but also Rick Scott’s in the U.S. Senate.

They are the ones pushing this garbage heap narrative that Trump is not a viable candidate because his refusal to acknowledge the validity of the 2020 election will somehow not resonate with an electorate, especially in the Republican primary, that agrees with him.  Furthermore, a key pillar of the DeSantis campaign espoused by its major influencers appears to be affirmation of the 2020 election results.  Here is what DeSantis’s PAC had to say about Trump’s recent CNN town hall – note the third point:

This makes sense, because the key selling point for replacing Trump as the GOP standard bearer with DeSantis must be that Trump is a proven loser.  You don’t fix something that isn’t broken, and the only way that it could be insinuated that Trump has spent all his political capital is to affirm a corrupt election.  Otherwise, there is no business case for replacement, no mandate for a major challenger to rise against Trump.

I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again here: there is no political future for Americans without a return to clean, transparent, and trustworthy elections.  This, for the time being, is a Constitutional Republic, one that has stood longer than any in the history of the world.  It is based upon liberty and justice for all, and a government of, by, and for the people.  It doesn’t make a damn bit of difference if a Republican or Democrat resides in the White House if that president didn’t punch his ticket there by the will of the people, as commanded by their votes.

DeSantis, along with Trump’s other primary challengers, refuses to give a clear opinion on the 2020 election when pressed, but in referring to his own credentials over Trump’s, alludes to Trump’s supposed inability to be re-elected in 2020, tacitly affirming the conduct of that election.  I haven’t heard a word from any of these challengers about Kari Lake’s ongoing lawfare against the corrupt Arizona cartel, though the evidence is radioactive even when she has the smallest windows available to make her cases.

I hope there are people outside of my bubble reading this article.  It is not intended to be a hit piece against any candidate, especially DeSantis, but is designed to have the reader understand that the people have lost complete control over this experiment in self-governance if our elections are pre-determined, or if our candidate selections have entered a pact to refuse to discuss corrupt elections.  If your candidate is allowed into office for not discussing the election corruption issue, is he a candidate seeking office to do the will of the people?  Would you want him in office if he were allowed to win based on not holding an opinion that would expose monumental corruption across the country?

This Fourth Turning crisis is going to determine if it is indeed the people who control this country or not, or if for the sake of “our team” winning a given office, we will consent to back candidates who are pre-approved to hold office because they won’t talk about the forbidden items, which are not strictly limited to elections.  Remember, Kari Lake wanted to cut the throats of the cartels destroying the lives of everyday Americans, and she paid the price by being put on the outside looking in (for now).

Personally, I am sick of hearing from candidates who tell me their local GOP cautioned them against discussing cheating in elections, even in rampant mail-in and ballot harvesting states, because it would somehow cost them their races, which they of course lost even after trying to play nice.  Here is a newsflash: You are losing your races because the other team is cheating and using your kindness against you.  Last year, I endorsed a 23-year-old political neophyte from Maine named Reagan Paul, who was running for State House.  Her state party didn’t care for her positions on election manipulation as she ran in a truly purple district on fixing election fraud and on a personhood amendment for the unborn…and won.  She has been one of the boldest voices for liberty that can be found in an otherwise dark region of our country and had more guts than every professional politician in the state who was afraid her boldness would cost what they perceived to be a difficult seat to win.  Instead, boldness took away a seat the Democrats expected to win going away.

Fortune favors the bold.  That proverb was true when it was first penned in 151 B.C. and remains true to this day.  People don’t want to support those who are timid and refuse to lead, like Greg Abbott, who has been in office too long to care anymore that his state is being overrun by illegal aliens and cartels, or that his Attorney General was impeached by a Republican House full of Bush lackeys and controlled opposition.  They want to support leaders who exhibit moral authority and want to make the same legacy for citizens of today as the founders sought to make for theirs, and posterity.

The fight for election integrity is the only political fight that matters right now.  As long as our solutions are political, which history suggests remains the case only for a limited window of time, we can have the best positions on life, borders, energy, taxation, crime, or education, and none of them matter for a hill of beans if we are not permitted to have our candidates elected because elections are corrupt.

Our entire national political future hinges on getting this issue right.

Author’s Note: This article is intended for widespread dissemination and to engage thought after a very divisive week. It is free from the time of publication. If you found this insightful, and are able to do so, your support as a paid subscriber would be appreciated and instrumental in keeping me independent in this fight for liberty. Thank you for reading!