Four Things Trump 47 Can and Must Do to Save America's Elections

Topic: Perspective

I shouldn’t have to tell any of my long-time readers this, but we are not going to be able to outvote the machine in every election from now until the end of time. The machine, currently owned and operated for the direct benefit of the Democrat Party, has roughly 200, if not 226 exactly, electoral votes on lockdown even when every state in the country shifts right from the previous election cycle, with many padded electoral votes owed directly to the maladministration of at least the most recent decennial census. All it takes to send the winds blowing left over seven or eight narrowly decided battlegrounds is a contrived media hoax, a coordinated electoral scam (like the one in 2020), or simply getting outsmarted and outhustled by a candidate not dumber than a box of rocks. Every 2028 Democrat favorite is much more talented at politicking and fakery than Kamala Harris could have ever dreamed to be.

All things considered, Trump prevailed over a gamed system last month, but not everyone down ballot from him could get past the machine’s tactics. As I have panned the country from county to county, I am identifying exactly why the U.S. House picture is as tight as it is despite the presidential popular vote win, am finding court decisions that rigged things seemingly on the up-and-up, which gave Democrats seats in red states they didn’t have, and I can see multiple seats that appear to be ripped off outright. I have been on record saying I believe three, if not four, U.S. Senate seats fell to these unsavory tactics, with Wisconsin’s the most obvious.

A 2024 Trump victory always came with the risk that people would call off the dogs on the election integrity agenda and perhaps chalk 2020 up to the equivalent of a bad dream. The media are already trying to paint a picture that the election deniers have gone silent, although they couldn’t get a good quote out of me and had to write me up for saying what amounts to, sure, go ahead and make my day by auditing the Trump win:

Seth Keshel, an election denier from Arizona who spent years touring the country with voter fraud claims, found a way to thread the needle: He said he believed Trump won fairly, but suggested there may still have been some fraud in down-ballot races where Democrats were leading.

“I believe the outcome is correct,” Keshel said in an interview. “I don’t believe that every state is right.”

It will be a major disservice to America if nothing gets done in the next four years to getting to the truth of our corrupt election system and expending all possible effort and friendly lawfare to cripple the election engineering that is responsible for making up most of the “blue wall,” and thereby depriving any Republican nominee of perhaps more than 40% of all electoral college votes before the first ballot is even tabulated. In this author’s opinion, I believe the incoming Trump 47 administration can and must do four things to begin revamping the way elections are run in this country:

---

I. Get the Election Reform Committee in Place

I have heard plenty of suggestions that elections will be investigated under Trump 2.0, and if you’re one of those upset about Pam Bondi as Attorney General, you will be heartened to know that she had nothing but contempt for the conduct of the 2020 quasi-election. An Election Reform Committee must have backward vision in quantifying and evaluating the 2020 results (I know a guy) and, at the same time, compile the lessons learned about a winning 2024 effort to have bulletproof data, facts, figures, and observations that can withstand public scrutiny.

Some have suggested Kari Lake as a charismatic figure to spearhead this effort, and there are plenty of other recommendations floating around. The eventual leader of this team must employ technical experts, legal scholars, capable investigators, public mouthpieces, and bulldogs who can merge lessons learned and not pretend to have all the answers, because the election problem is vast and spread in varying capacities across 50 states, Washington, D.C., and five split electoral districts belonging to Maine and Nebraska. Ideally, this team will be announced before Inauguration Day – January 20, 2025.

---

II. Demand and Specify Regional Audits of the 2024 Presidential Election

You want a power move? I can think of none bigger or more meaningful than for President Trump himself to push his chips to the center of the table and recommend his own election victory for rigorous audits. These maps offer us a great starting point:

There are plenty of people on the left who seem to have no trouble believing a senile political retread who didn’t campaign could somehow tally more than 81 million votes, but can’t fathom how his 87 I.Q. Vice President who obtained the Democrat Party nomination in a uniquely un-Democratic way lost every battleground state and the popular vote, with every known indicator, bellwether, trend, and predictor suggesting that was likely and something someone could reasonably predict with perfect accuracy.

Let’s give them what they want, knowing it will prove what we have been saying all along. We can even call them Unity Election Audits. I felt one of President Trump’s best options after the 2020 election (and before he left office) was to call for an audit of North Carolina, which he won, but by a dubiously low margin of victory despite a massive Republican registration wave in nearly every county. That would have expressed the confidence needed to show the truth in a close election at the risk of having that victory shaken loose that we needed to earn a mandate to go after the states that were “lost.” I think the best play for getting to the whole truth is for Trump’s Election Reform Committee (appointed in Step I) to propose what amounts to a World Cup of Audits in all eight battleground states (my Seven Decisive States plus North Carolina). Here is what I would recommend:

These are not recounts. These counties will be audited based on acceptable and proper criteria that hinges on voter eligibility for the exclusive purpose of filtering out counterfeit ballots. Evidence of counterfeit balloting is in vast supply, and it comes overwhelmingly from reckless handling of absentee and no-excuse mail in balloting harvested over a lengthy early voting period. All election fraud begins in the voter roll, which the cleanest state – North Dakota – doesn’t even have. Like a cancer, it feeds itself through mail-in balloting expansion with weeks on tap for the harvesting rings to get them. It is a machine, and the cleanest states from this year’s elections prohibit most things by law that make blue states blue. In the simplest manner possible, these audit committees need to find out:

· Who voted?

· How many of those said voters are eligible to vote?

· Did all eligible voters vote only once?

· Were all votes cast legally?

· To what extent is Same Day Registration exploited?

These audits will likely find that substantial Democrat margin in blue counties was provided by fraudulently placed mail-in ballots that are harvested in population dense areas and placed on registrations belonging to duplicated real voters, people who don’t intend to vote but were placed on a voter roll through Automatic Voter Registration, or entries that don’t tie to a real human being at all.

---

III. Take the 2024 Lessons Learned and Go “Scorched Earth” on the 2020 Quasi-Election